Handball

Norway --> Postenligaen

Next matches

11.03

Sandefjord TIF

30

32

Runar

-18

X2

 details

11.03

Drammen

31

31

Bergen

1

X

 details

Naerbo

30

-

29

Arendal

Naerbo win: 54%

Draw: 3%

Arendal win: 43%
1X
Overall Home Away Overall Home Away
47.8 % 66.7 % 27.3 % wins 40.9 % 36.4 % 45.5 %
4.3 % 0 % 9.1 % draws 4.5 % 9.1 % 0 %
47.8 % 33.3 % 63.6 % losses 54.5 % 54.5 % 54.5 %
1 1.33 0.64 avarage points 0.86 0.82 0.91
29.09 29.75 28.36 av. goals for 28.82 28.82 28.82
29.26 28.25 30.36 av. goals against 31.32 32.09 30.55
Naerbo home
31.08 Baekkelaget 32-23
14.09 Elverum 20-29
08.10 Runar 35-33
22.10 Kristiansand 28-27
08.11 Drammen 25-28
29.11 Bergen 35-28
10.12 Kolstad 26-36
20.12 Sandefjord TIF 32-33
08.02 Sandnes 33-21
15.02 Fjellhammer 31-29
04.03 Arendal 33-29
08.03 Halden 27-23
Arendal home
03.09 Elverum 18-37
18.09 Runar 29-30
05.10 Kristiansand 36-31
12.10 Kolstad 30-42
25.10 Naerbo 30-35
16.11 Bergen 26-35
30.11 Baekkelaget 22-27
20.12 Sandnes 29-28
08.02 Fjellhammer 37-33
22.02 Drammen 31-31
08.03 Follo 29-24
Naerbo away
07.09 Sandefjord TIF 24-25
28.09 Sandnes 29-27
15.10 Fjellhammer 30-27
25.10 Arendal 35-30
26.11 Halden 28-36
07.12 Follo 24-31
13.12 Baekkelaget 29-29
05.02 Elverum 28-34
11.02 Runar 28-32
22.02 Kristiansand 24-28
01.03 Kolstad 33-35
Arendal away
07.09 Sandnes 31-27
28.09 Fjellhammer 26-25
19.10 Drammen 27-29
09.11 Halden 24-23
26.11 Follo 39-40
07.12 Sandefjord TIF 25-30
13.12 Elverum 27-37
05.02 Runar 30-35
11.02 Kristiansand 28-27
14.02 Kolstad 31-30
04.03 Naerbo 29-33
Overall table
Team P W D L F A Pts
1. Elverum 22 20 1 1 737 568 41
2. Kolstad 22 18 1 3 725 594 37
3. Runar 23 14 3 6 774 729 31
4. Bergen 21 12 3 6 673 628 27
5. Drammen 20 12 2 6 626 596 26
6. Naerbo 23 11 1 11 669 673 23
7. Sandefjord TIF 22 9 2 11 620 679 20
8. Arendal 22 9 1 12 634 689 19
9. Kristiansand 23 8 2 13 710 742 18
10. Follo 22 7 3 12 656 679 17
11. Fjellhammer 22 7 3 12 599 622 17
12. Baekkelaget 22 5 2 15 620 664 12
13. Halden 22 4 2 16 570 627 10
14. Sandnes 22 5 0 17 564 687 10
Home table
Team P W D L F A Pts
1. Runar 12 9 1 2 409 370 19
2. Kolstad 11 9 0 2 374 304 18
3. Elverum 10 9 0 1 338 288 18
4. Naerbo 12 8 0 4 357 339 16
5. Bergen 11 6 3 2 356 329 15
6. Drammen 10 6 0 4 314 298 12
7. Follo 11 5 2 4 338 324 12
8. Kristiansand 11 6 0 5 344 336 12
9. Sandefjord TIF 11 5 1 5 310 336 11
10. Arendal 11 4 1 6 317 353 9
11. Fjellhammer 11 3 2 6 291 300 8
12. Sandnes 11 4 0 7 282 338 8
13. Halden 11 2 2 7 287 302 6
14. Baekkelaget 11 2 1 8 314 329 5
Away table
Team P W D L F A Pts
1. Elverum 12 11 1 0 399 280 23
2. Kolstad 11 9 1 1 351 290 19
3. Drammen 10 6 2 2 312 298 14
4. Bergen 10 6 0 4 317 299 12
5. Runar 11 5 2 4 365 359 12
6. Arendal 11 5 0 6 317 336 10
7. Fjellhammer 11 4 1 6 308 322 9
8. Sandefjord TIF 11 4 1 6 310 343 9
9. Naerbo 11 3 1 7 312 334 7
10. Baekkelaget 11 3 1 7 306 335 7
11. Kristiansand 12 2 2 8 366 406 6
12. Follo 11 2 1 8 318 355 5
13. Halden 11 2 0 9 283 325 4
14. Sandnes 11 1 0 10 282 349 2
Last 6 games table
Team P W D L F A Pts
1. Elverum 6 6 0 0 203 160 12
2. Kolstad 6 5 0 1 202 159 10
3. Arendal 6 4 1 1 185 178 9
4. Bergen 6 4 0 2 197 189 8
5. Drammen 6 3 1 2 199 187 7
6. Sandefjord TIF 6 3 0 3 174 172 6
7. Naerbo 6 3 0 3 176 176 6
8. Runar 6 3 0 3 196 201 6
9. Kristiansand 6 3 0 3 179 185 6
10. Follo 6 2 1 3 186 195 5
11. Fjellhammer 6 2 0 4 174 179 4
12. Baekkelaget 6 1 1 4 166 177 3
13. Sandnes 6 1 0 5 137 196 2
14. Halden 6 0 0 6 145 172 0
Latest results
08.03 Arendal Follo 29-24
08.03 Sandnes Kolstad 16-40
08.03 Kristiansand Baekkelaget 38-29
08.03 Fjellhammer Sandefjord TIF 29-30
08.03 Naerbo Halden 27-23
07.03 Runar Elverum 27-38
04.03 Naerbo Arendal 33-29
04.03 Halden Kristiansand 20-23
01.03 Bergen Fjellhammer 28-34
01.03 Follo Runar 38-32
01.03 Kolstad Naerbo 35-33
28.02 Baekkelaget Sandnes 32-15
27.02 Elverum Sandefjord TIF 34-26
25.02 Runar Bergen 38-39
22.02 Arendal Drammen 31-31
22.02 Sandefjord TIF Kolstad 22-24
22.02 Fjellhammer Halden 25-23
22.02 Sandnes Follo 33-37
22.02 Kristiansand Naerbo 28-24
20.02 Elverum Baekkelaget 33-26
comments powered by Disqus